Polycarbonate or acrylic for your skylight or canopy? Compare impact strength, UV stability, light transmission, cost, and fire behaviour to choose the right sheet for Indian conditions.
Walk into any plastics supplier and you will be shown two clear, glass-like sheets that look almost identical: acrylic (PMMA) and polycarbonate. Both are lighter than glass, both transmit plenty of daylight, and both are sold for skylights, canopies, and roofing. Yet they behave very differently once they are fixed on a roof in an Indian summer, a pre-monsoon hailstorm, or a busy public space.
This guide compares the two materials honestly — including the areas where acrylic genuinely wins — so you can specify the right sheet for the job rather than the cheapest one on the quotation.
For most roofing applications in India — skylights, industrial roof lights, canopies, carports, and public-access structures — a UV-protected polycarbonate sheet is the safer specification, mainly because of its impact resistance. Acrylic is a reasonable choice for low-risk, low-impact applications where optical clarity and cost matter more than toughness.
The rest of this post explains why, so you can test the claim against your own project.
This is the biggest practical difference. Polycarbonate is an exceptionally tough thermoplastic. Acrylic is rigid but brittle: under a sharp impact it tends to crack or shatter, while polycarbonate typically deforms or dents. Published comparisons put polycarbonate's impact strength at many times that of acrylic, though the exact multiple varies by test method and source, so treat any single headline number with caution.
On a roof, the impact events are real: hail, falling branches, a dropped tool during maintenance, or thrown objects at a public bus shelter. Our post on hailstorm impact resistance covers how thickness and structure affect performance. If a broken panel creates a safety risk or an expensive replacement, impact resistance should dominate your decision.
Here acrylic has a natural advantage. Acrylic is inherently resistant to UV degradation and tends to keep its clarity outdoors. Standard unprotected polycarbonate, by contrast, will yellow and embrittle under prolonged sun exposure.
That is why roofing-grade polycarbonate is not sold as bare sheet. It carries a UV-protective layer, typically co-extruded onto the exposed face, and that layer is the real determinant of how the panel ages. The practical implication for buyers: never compare "acrylic vs polycarbonate" in the abstract. Compare acrylic against a specific polycarbonate with a documented UV layer and a written warranty. We explain what separates good UV protection from marketing in UV yellowing and long-term transparency, and what the warranty should actually say in our warranty checklist.
Also remember that the UV layer only protects the face it is on. A sheet installed upside down, with the protected face to the interior, will fail early regardless of the base material.
Clear acrylic transmits slightly more visible light than clear solid polycarbonate — figures of roughly 90 percent versus the mid-to-high 80s are commonly quoted for clear solid sheet. For multiwall polycarbonate, light transmission is lower because light passes through several layers and internal walls, and it varies with structure, thickness, and colour.
Higher is not automatically better. As we explain in why high light transmission isn't better daylight, a roof that admits a lot of direct, clear light often produces glare and heat rather than comfortable illumination. Diffusing or opal grades of either material spread light more evenly.
Solid acrylic and solid polycarbonate both conduct heat readily, so neither is a good insulator in single-skin form. The major thermal advantage in the polycarbonate family comes from multiwall and multicell structures, whose trapped air gives much lower U-values. If your project cares about comfort or cooling load, a multiwall polycarbonate system generally outperforms a single acrylic skin. See our multiwall, multicell, and solid guide for the trade-offs.
Both are far lighter than glass, which lets you use lighter supporting steel. Polycarbonate can be cold-bent to a curve on site (within the manufacturer's minimum radius), making it popular for arched canopies. Acrylic is stiffer and can crack when cold-formed, so curved roofs in acrylic usually require thermoforming in a workshop. Always check span tables and fixing details with the manufacturer for either material.
Both are combustible plastics, and their fire behaviour differs by grade. Acrylic burns readily and continues to burn; polycarbonate is inherently harder to ignite, and flame-retardant grades are available. Where the roof covers an occupied space, confirm the tested fire classification of the exact product against the applicable code. Our guide to polycarbonate fire safety ratings explains what to ask for.
Acrylic is often cheaper per square metre at purchase. But the lowest purchase price is rarely the lowest lifecycle cost: one cracked panel in a hailstorm, or a roof replaced early, erases the saving. The lesson is the same one we describe in why the cheapest polycarbonate becomes the most expensive on site — compare total installed cost and risk, not just rate per sheet.
If a supplier cannot answer these with documents rather than adjectives, treat the quotation with caution.
Not sure which sheet suits your roof? Coxwell's technical team can recommend a system based on span, climate, and use. Talk to us about your project and get a specification you can defend.
For most roofing uses in India, UV-protected polycarbonate is the safer choice because it is far more impact resistant than acrylic and is available in insulating multiwall forms and flame-retardant grades. Acrylic can be suitable for small, low-impact applications where optical clarity is the priority.
Unprotected polycarbonate yellows faster than acrylic. Roofing-grade polycarbonate is supplied with a co-extruded UV-protective layer, and its long-term clarity depends on the quality of that layer and on installing the protected face outward. Ask for a written UV warranty.
Acrylic is often cheaper per square metre at purchase, but a brittle sheet that cracks from hail or impact can cost more over its life. Compare installed cost and replacement risk rather than only the sheet rate.
Polycarbonate can usually be cold-bent to a curve within the manufacturer's minimum radius, which is why it is common on arched canopies. Acrylic is more prone to cracking when cold-formed and generally needs workshop thermoforming for curved applications.
Next step
Our team can help you specify the right system, review your BOQ, or answer technical questions about your project.