"10% of the roof" is a rule of thumb, not a specification. Here's how daylight factor actually determines the right rooflight area — and why distribution matters as much as total percentage.
"How much of the roof should be polycarbonate?" is one of the most common questions we get from contractors and architects sizing a rooflight scheme — and one of the most commonly answered wrong. The usual response, repeated across vendor brochures and site conversations, is a flat rule: "10% of roof area," or sometimes "15%." Neither number is meaningless, but treating it as a universal answer produces daylighted roofs that are either dim and unconvincing or bright to the point of glare and heat discomfort.
This post explains what actually determines rooflight area — starting with daylight factor, the metric behind the rule of thumb — and gives you a practical way to size a scheme correctly rather than guessing.
Daylight factor (DF) is the ratio of the light level inside a building to the light level outside under an overcast sky, expressed as a percentage. A DF of 2% means the illuminance at a given point inside is 2% of the illuminance available outdoors at that moment.
Daylight factor is deliberately calculated using overcast sky conditions rather than direct sun — this makes it a stable, comparable metric independent of season, time of day, or sun position. It answers a design question: "on a dull, overcast working day, will this space have usable daylight?" rather than "what does this room look like on a bright afternoon?"
Typical target daylight factors:
The 10–15% rule exists because, for a typical single-storey industrial shed with a reasonably reflective interior and rooflight panels of average light transmission, that ratio tends to land somewhere near a workable daylight factor. But every one of those assumptions is a variable that changes the real number your project needs:
| Variable | Effect on required rooflight % |
|---|---|
| Panel light transmission (LT) | Lower LT (e.g. 25–35% diffused/opal) needs more area for the same daylight factor than higher LT (55–65%) clear or lightly tinted sheet |
| Roof height above the working plane | Taller buildings spread the same light over a larger floor area, reducing daylight factor at floor level for the same rooflight % |
| Internal reflectance (wall/floor colour) | Light-coloured interiors bounce more daylight around, effectively increasing daylight factor without adding rooflight area |
| Building depth / span | Deep-plan buildings need proportionally more rooflight, or a different distribution, to daylight the centre of the floor plate evenly |
| Orientation and roof pitch | Changes solar heat gain and glare risk more than daylight factor itself — see our orientation guide |
Two buildings with an identical 12% rooflight ratio can deliver very different lit results depending on these factors. That's why we treat 10–15% as a sizing starting point for a budget estimate — never as a specification.
A mistake we see almost as often as wrong area is wrong distribution. Concentrating the full rooflight allowance into one large block — a single continuous run down the centre of the roof, for instance — creates a bright band with dark zones on either side, rather than even daylight across the floor.
The better approach is to distribute rooflight panels evenly across the roof plane, generally as individual panels or short runs spaced at regular bay intervals rather than one large concentration. This produces more even lux distribution and avoids the strong light/dark contrast that causes eyes to struggle adjusting between zones — a common complaint in poorly planned warehouse daylighting.
Rather than picking a percentage and hoping, we recommend this sequence for any project beyond a small shed:
The rule of thumb gets you a budget number. Simulation gets you a specification you can defend.
Under-sizing rooflight area is the more common mistake in cost-conscious projects — the roof ends up needing supplementary lighting on every working day, defeating the purpose of daylighting in the first place and adding an ongoing energy cost that a correctly sized scheme would have avoided. Our warehouse energy savings post covers what that gap actually costs over time.
Over-sizing is less common but more expensive to fix: excess rooflight area, especially in high-LT clear sheet on an east- or west-facing pitch, produces glare and solar heat gain that often ends with someone applying reflective paint or shade cloth over skylights a few years after installation — permanently undoing the daylighting investment.
Before locking a rooflight percentage into a BOQ, ask: "What daylight factor does this deliver at floor level, in this specific building, with this specific panel?" If the honest answer is "we used 12% because that's standard," it's worth a simulation pass before the roof sheets are ordered. A rooflight layout is far cheaper to adjust on paper than to retrofit after installation.
Coxwell's technical team offers daylight sizing support for architects and contractors specifying rooflight schemes — from LT selection to layout and simulation. Get in touch with your roof plan and building use, and we'll help you size it correctly the first time.
Next step
Our team can help you specify the right system, review your BOQ, or answer technical questions about your project.